Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Atlanta v. Kleber

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 4, 2009No. S08G1417, S08G1424Published

1DissentHunstein, Presiding Justice

The plaintiff homeowners’ nuisance claim against Defendant Norfolk Southern Corporation is not barred by the statute of *420limitations. As the majority correctly states, the classification of an alleged nuisance as permanent or continuing in nature directly controls the manner in which the applicable four-year statute of limitations is applied. However, the majority incorrectly classifies the intermittent flooding on the homeowners’ property that allegedly was caused by the presence of the Defendant’s drainage pipe as a permanent nuisance. In reaching this conclusion, the majority asserts that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Columbus, Ga. v. MyszkaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. City Council v. LombardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Hibbs v. City of RiverdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Cox v. Cambridge Square Towne Houses, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Brand v. Montega Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API