Legal Opinion

Tynan v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 27, 1971No. 40280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Justice.

This is a conflict certiorari review of a per curiam decision, 238 So.2d 700, without written opinion of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, affirming the trial judge’s order granting defendants’ (Respondents’) motion for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict in this case.

The trial judge’s record order sets forth the factual situation of the case, as well as the basis for his judgment n. o. v. sufficient to inform as to the nature of the case and its disposition and to give us jurisdiction to review the case by cer-tiorari. The order reads as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Stirling v. SappSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  4. Draiss v. PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Conda v. PlainSupreme Court of Florida · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Dade County v. St. ClaireDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Allison Transmission, Inc. v. JR Sailing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Varnadoe v. Desoto Canning Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Walters ex rel. Walters v. Independent Concrete Products, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API