Hoagland v. Canfield
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
At Law. Motion by plaintiff for a new trial on exceptions to rulings in receiving and rejecting evidence; to the charge as made: to refusals to charge; and on the ground that the verdict is contrary to and unsupported by the evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtRay, District Judge
This action has been tried three times. On the first two trials the jury disagreed. On the. third trial, the jury rendered a verdict for the defendant. The evidence in some respects was quite conflicting. On the 15th day of August, 1903, on the crosswalk of Jay street, in the city of New York, which runs east and v/est and enters West street which runs north and south parallel with the North River, but does not continue further west, and at the point where Jay street enters West street, the plaintiff was struck or caught by the pole of a heavy truck, loaded with some five or six tons of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- People v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Leovy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Barker v. . SavageNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Pasquale Charles MarzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Collenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.