Legal Opinion · Dissent

James K.J. Cheng v. Gaf Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 23, 1983No. 1116, Docket 82-7956Published

1DissentTimbers, Circuit Judge

The surest way to undermine the long standing final judgment rule — the cornerstone of federal appellate jurisdiction — is to sanction the corrosive erosion of particular exceptions. Here the majority, in its rush to reach the merits, has strained to create an exception which is not necessary and, in my view, is contrary to controlling law. I therefore respectfully dissent.

As the majority recognizes, there are three discrete requirements before the collateral order rule of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 (1949), may be invoked: (1) the order must conclusively…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API