Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ayers v. Landow

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1995No. 93-CV-1505Published

1DissentRuiz, Associate Judge

Robert W. Ayers, a landlord, brought an action for possession of real estate in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the Superior Court as a result of the failure of the tenant, Stuart Landow, to cure numerous violations of tenancy in the landlord’s apartment building. The trial judge entered judgment in the tenant’s favor, ruling that he did not receive a properly-served notice to cure the violations or quit the premises as required by statutory service provisions. Because I conclude that the tenant did receive notice consistent with statutory requirements, I would reverse the judgment and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Marcos L. Anderson, A/K/A Marcos Loinas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. Jensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Tanzilli v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API