Hicks v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtPolen, J.
Appellant, Jarvis Hicks, appeals his conviction for attempted first degree murder with a firearm. He argues that the trial court failed to conduct a Richardson 1 hearing upon learning that the State had failed to provide appellant written notice of the substance of his statement to Detective Foster, and failed to identify Foster as a witness to this statement, until the day of trial. We find that the State did not commit a discovery violation by failing to provide appellant with written notice of the substance of his statement. However, we agree with appellant that the State’s failure to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jaime Deandre Brown v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Kipp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Terry Bess v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- LYNESHA DELORES ETIENNE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- LYNESHA DELORES ETIENNE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023