Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Castle Aviation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 7, 2009No. C.A. No. 2:09-749; MDL No. 1721PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER VACATING CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel*: Plaintiff in an action pending in the Southern District of Ohio {Friedman), joined by plaintiffs already in MDL No. 1721, move, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our order conditionally transferring the action to the District of Kansas for inclusion in the MDL. Responding defendant Cessna Aircraft Co. (Cessna) opposes the motion to vacate. After considering all argument of counsel and the current status of the MDL, we will grant the motion to vacate.

Friedma…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Cessna 208 Series Aircraft Prod. Liab. Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API