Estate of McKinney v. Sofka

We affirm the order permitting the reopening of this estate in order that a claim may be made against casualty insurance allegedly covering the estate’s liability for the claim. See § 733.903, Fla.Stat. (1987); Kent Ins. Co. v. Estate of Atwood, 481 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

While we view the only dispositive issue at this time in this probate case as that addressed above, we add the following observations concerning other arguments presented to us. Contrary to the argument of appellant, we do not conclude that the claim, which arose during the administration of the estate, is time…