Legal Opinion
Taskiran v. Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, improperly commenced as a special proceeding, *361to set aside an allegedly fraudulent conveyance of real property, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated July 8, 2003, as, after converting the special proceeding to an action, in effect, sua sponte treated the petition as a motion for summary judgment and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiffs setting aside the challenged conveyance.
Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mihlovan v. GrozavuNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Phalen v. Theatrical Protective Union No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Friends World College v. NicklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Skyline Enterprises of N. Y. Corp. v. Amuram Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abinanti v. PascaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Marini v. LombardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- WBP Central Associates, LLC v. DeColaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Nichols v. BDS Landscape DesignAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- O'Brien v. Chase Home Finance, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007