Miller v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Phillip D. Miller appeals his convictions for Forgery,1 a class C felony, and Theft,2 a class D felony. Miller raises three issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as two. We also raise one issue sua sponte.
I. Whether sufficient evidence was presented to sustain Miller’s convictions for Forgery and Theft.
II. Whether the admission of a handwriting sample violated Miller’s Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of counsel.
III. Whether Miller’s six-year sentence for Theft exceeds the statutory maximum for a class D felony.
We affirm in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jordan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Mullins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- American Express Co. v. Peoples Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Gillie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- VanPelt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Pope v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Antwain Bateman v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Cijka v. StateVermont Superior Court · 2026
- D'Andre Driver v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.