Legal Opinion
Erazo v. Morton
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 2010No. 09-CA-661PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.
lain this proceeding concerning a landlord’s alleged failure to repair leased premises, defendant/appellant Chris Morton (“Morton”) appeals a judgment he characterizes as a default judgment. 1 Morton contends that the trial court erred in granting the judgment because the evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case. Morton additionally contends that the trial judge erred in denying his motion for new trial. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the appeal as untimely.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The following allegations were developed from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Canovsky v. GehrsenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Myles v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JimenezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Tucker v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kessler Federal Credit Union v. RiveroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- McCain v. McCloudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012