Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens First National Bank v. Moe Motor Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1991No. 90-607Published

1DissentJustice Hunt

I dissent. Once again, this Court takes it upon itself to determine material questions of fact, further eroding a litigant’s right to a trial by jury.

Summary judgment should be granted only if no issues of material fact exist. Rule 56(c), M.R.Civ.R All reasonable inferences must be drawn in favor of the party opposing the motion. Cereck v. Albertson’s Inc., 195 Mont. 409, 411, 637 P.2d 509, 511 (1981). Although the majority gives lip service to these time-honored rules, it refuses to apply them in this case. Instead, it selects evidence that tends to demonstrate CFNB’s view of the suit while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cereck v. Albertson's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bottrell v. American BankMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hackin v. First National Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API