Legal Opinion

State v. Santiago

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2008No. 26,859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VIGIL, Judge.

{1} The State appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress. Defendant was searched outside of a shopping mall by private mall security guards after he was maced, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed, because he had a verbal confrontation with a peer within the mall. As a result of the search, the mall security guards discovered a pill bottle in Defendant’s pants pocket containing cocaine. The district court concluded that the search and seizure conducted by the mall security guards is governed by the Fourth Amendment. Further, the district…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SantiagoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API