Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Liefer

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1904No. L.A. No. 1290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHbnshaw, J.

This action was for rescission. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The facts found by the court are, that upon the land of one Mrs. H. A. Unruh a well had been dug. Defendant Liefer agreed by written contract with H. A. Unruh, husband of Mrs. Unruh, to install a pumping plant and other machinery for the development of water in the well, and when the same was installed Unruh agreed to convey to Liefer an undivided one-half interest in the eight hundred square feet of land in which the pla'nt and well-shaft were located, “and thereafter the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis, S. F. & T. Ry. Co. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. B. Nicoll & Co. v. National Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API