Legal Opinion

Hooper v. William P. Laytham Sons Co., Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 26, 1944No. Docket 123/172, 122/388Published

1Opinion of the Court

There are two suits before the court involving the same parties. Both were filed before process was served in either and the two have been heard together.

In one, Henry Y. Hooper and Robert E. Byrne, trading as the Hooper Byrne Company, sue the Laytham corporation, which operates a foundry, praying for an accounting and payment of commissions at the rate of five per cent. on all business done by the foundry with certain named customers which they introduced to the foundry corporation. The suit is limited to business done since 1936. It is based upon an alleged contract as set forth in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. In re Walsh's EstateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Mayor of Paterson v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
  4. In Re LeuppNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  5. Shearman v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API