Johnson v. O'Neill
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Assumpsit by Arland W. Johnson against John G. • O’Neill and another for work, labor and services. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
This case is now before the court for the second time. Reference is made to our former decision, 172 Mich. 334 (137 N. W. 713), where the matter in dispute is set forth. Plaintiff has again recovered a judgment, which defendants again review in this court by writ of error.
There are some 66 assignments of error, a part only of which are argued and relied upon in defendants’ brief. The first item discussed is that of $262.50, claimed by plaintiff as an extra for changing the plans after the contract had been let. The record shows that after the contract had been let defendants desired changes…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. O'NeillMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- Malcomson-Houghten Co. v. Gregorian Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916