Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Eckstrom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly rejected the contention of defendant Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) that the automobile liability insurance policy that Allstate issued to defendant Christopher A. Eckstrom (Eckstrom) did not provide coverage to Eckstrom for the June 28, 1987 automobile accident that resulted in the underlying tort action. Supreme Court, in *932granting the cross motions of plaintiff, Eckstrom, and defendant Joyce Eckstrom for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. St. Lawrence University v. Trustees of the Theological School of St. Lawrence UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Baier v. Town of ElleryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Kovaleski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kennedy v. Valley Forge Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API