Legal Opinion

Eau Claire Press Co. v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 26, 1993No. 92-1570PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

The Eau Claire Press Co. and Janean Marti (the newspaper) appeal a judgment denying them attorney fees, costs, damages and punitive damages under sec. 19.37, Stats., the state open records law. We conclude that the newspaper is entitled to its attorney fees, costs and damages under sec. 19.37 because the mandamus action it initiated was a substantial factor in causing the city to release the requested information. However, it is not entitled to punitive damages because the city did not arbitrarily or capriciously deny or delay its response to the newspaper's request.

On May 30, 1991, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eddie David Cox v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Village of Butler v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. Racine Education Ass'n v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Racine Education Ass'n v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel. Young v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. WTMJ, Inc. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Capital Times Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  4. Friends of Frame Park, U.A. v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API