Legal Opinion

Herried v. Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Authority Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 27, 1998No. 20843-1-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Pauline Herried, a training instructor with Pierce Transit, sued her employer, alleging that she was sexually harassed by a fellow employee. She also alleged that Pierce Transit was liable for negligently supervising the fellow employee. The trial court granted summary judgment for the employer, ruling that Herried failed to show that she was harassed because of her sex; the court also ruled that Herried’s negligent supervision claim was barred by the Industrial Insurance Act. We affirm.

Facts

Herried and Ed Washington, both employees of Pierce Transit, started working together as instructors…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Glasgow v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Estevez v. Faculty Club of the University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Estevez v. Faculty Club of Univ. of Wash.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Briggs v. Nova ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Estep v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API