Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Blunt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Floyd District Court. Action by indorsee of promissory notes against tbe payee and indorser.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

In his answer, the defendant after denying tbe matters contained in the plaintiff’s petition, pleads a set-off. On tbe trial, tbe plaintiff to maintain bis action, introduced tbe defendant as a witness. Tbe defendants counsel after cross-examining him, as to those matters called out in *201the examination in chief, proposed to make him a general witness, and to prove by him “his part of the case.” To this plaintiff objected, and the objection was overruled. The plaintiff then withdrew his action, and the defendant’s counsel proceeded to examine him to prove his cross action, to which plaintiff…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. CummingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  2. Hunger v. BarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API