Legal Opinion
Marshak v. Sheppard
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 8, 2020No. 19-1885-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-1885-cv Marshak v. Sheppard UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Airlines, Inc. v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Stevens v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Thomas A. Gleason v. John Jandrucko, Richard Spota, and Village of North TarrytownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.