Legal Opinion

Applicability of Section 410 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 to the Gateway Development Commission

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided February 13, 2020Published

1Opinion of the Court

(Slip Opinion) Applicability of Section 410 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 to the Gateway Development Commission New Jersey’s proposed diversion of a portion of its annual payment to Amtrak to a bridge project subject to the authority of the Gateway Development Commission, an interstate entity established by New York and New Jersey, would violate section 410 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997, which prohibits States from carrying out an interstate compact by using state or federal funds made available for Amtrak. February 13, 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API