Gaston v. State

Pope, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of trafficking in cocaine. He appeals following the denial of his motion for new trial.

1. Contrary to defendant’s first and eighth enumerations of error, the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. The defendant contends the trial court erred by allowing the prosecutor, over objection, to propound the following question to the jury on voir dire: “Is there any juror who holds the view that drugs should be decriminalized or made…