Hanson v. Webber
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Report from Nisi Prius, Appleton, J., presiding. Assumpsit, upon an award. The submission was as follows: — “Jan. 12, 1852. We hereby agree to submit the question respecting the oxen sold by A. Webber to Charles Hanson and claimed by Robert H. Libbey, to the determination of S. H. Blake, A. H. Briggs and A. Knowles, Esquires, whose decision in the premises shall settle the whole controversy between the parties as to the ownership of said oxen, and how much shall be paid…
Read the full summary
On Report from Nisi Prius, Appleton, J., presiding. Assumpsit, upon an award. The submission was as follows: — “Jan. 12, 1852. We hereby agree to submit the question respecting the oxen sold by A. Webber to Charles Hanson and claimed by Robert H. Libbey, to the determination of S. H. Blake, A. H. Briggs and A. Knowles, Esquires, whose decision in the premises shall settle the whole controversy between the parties as to the ownership of said oxen, and how much shall be paid for the same, and by whom, and who shall be entitled to receive said amount, and we agree to abide by the decision. . “…
1Opinion of the CourtTenney, J.
The question submitted was respecting the oxen sold by A. Webber to Charles Hanson, and claimed by Robert H. Libbey, and the referees were to settle the whole controversy between the parties as to the ownership of said *196oxen, and how much shall be paid for the same, and by whom, and who shall be entitled to receive said amount.
According to the agreement in the submission, the referees heard the parties, and awarded that Charles Hanson should be paid by A. Webber, the sum of $92,25, and that Webber should pay to Robert H. Libbey, the sum of $50, Ac.
The award is objected to by the defendant, on…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Morrison v. BuchananSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859