Legal Opinion

People v. Burks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant’s absence from a Sandoval and Ventimiglia conference warrants reversal. Subsequent proceedings held in open court in defendant’s presence constituted a de novo Sandoval and Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Vargas, 201 AD2d 963, lv denied 83 NY2d 859; People v Russell, 191 AD2d 1001, lv denied 81 NY2d 1019; People v Berger, 188 AD2d 1073, 1074, lv denied 81 NY2d 881). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Scheme to Defraud, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. AlcantaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API