Legal Opinion

Isabelle v. Eddings

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 1926No. 16495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The defendants' in error have moved the court to dismiss the appeal for the reason that it has not been prosecuted in the required statutory manner so as to confer jurisdiction upon the court here.

A journal entry of judgment was signed by the trial judge under date December 10, 1924. This journal entry was filed February 26, 1925. Under date of February 16, 1925, another journal entry was signed by the trial judge, fixing the rights of some of the parties to the litigation. This journal entry was filed March 9, 1925. The plaintiff in error filed his motion, -for a new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. De GeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Brooks v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BonhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API