Watts Detective Agency, Inc. v. Inhabitants of Sagadahoc
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
The issue in this case, which comes up on report, is whether the county of Sagadahoc is under legal obligation to pay the plaintiff detective agency for services and expenses of its operatives in connection with the investigation of an alleged crime. The county attorney arranged for the employment without consultation with the county commissioners and without their knowledge. After detectives had been at work for about three weeks, an account of the plaintiff of $2,092.00 was presented by the county attorney to the county commissioners. Action on the matter was deferred while the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rackliff v. Inhabitants of GreenbushSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
- Withee v. Lane & Libby Fisheries Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Michaud v. Inhabitants of St. FrancisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
- Van Buren Light & Power Co. v. Inhabitants of Van BurenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917
- Lunn v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Town of Worland v. Odell & JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Sheltra v. AugerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Paine v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969