Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Kirkpatrick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 16, 1984No. 65167PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants in a declaratory judgment action relying on first amendment ground (U.S. Const, amend. I) challenge a specific provision of the Missouri Campaign Finance Disclosure Law1 — § 130.056.1(3), Cum.Supp.1983. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted. This appeal followed and is lodged in this Court by virtue of Mo. Const, art. V, § 3 which vests exclusive appellate jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of all cases involving the validity of a state statute.

We find § 130.056.1(3), which imposes certain strictures on the use of campaign contribution reports,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Champ v. PoelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Missouri Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Shrink Missouri Government PAC v. MaupinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Shrink Missouri Government Pac v. MaupinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Zeller v. the Florida BarDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API