Legal Opinion

Lew v. Sobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A custodial parent’s deliberate frustration of, or active interference with, the noncustodial parent’s visitation rights can warrant the suspension of future child support payments (see Domestic Relations Law § 241; Ledgin v Ledgin, 36 AD3d 669 [2007]; Hiross v Hiross, 224 AD2d 662, 663 [1996]). Pursuant to a prior order of this Court (see Matter of Lew v Sobel, 46 AD3d 893 [2007]), the father paid one half of his child support obligation to the mother and one half to the mother’s attorney, to be held in an escrow account until the mother could certify, to the satisfaction of the Supreme…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ledgin v. LedginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Hiross v. HirossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Lew v. SobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Matter of Lew v. SobelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Whitaker v. CaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API