Noto v. Headley
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtM. Henry Martuscello, J.
Defendants move for an order directing plaintiff to serve an amended complaint separately stating and numbering several causes of action claimed to be set forth in the complaint herein.
*234Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that this action is brought pursuant to article 15 of the Real Property Law of the State of New York; and he substantially claims therein that he is the sole owner in fee and in possession of certain described property which in January, 1955 was jointly owned by one Michael De Pino, now deceased, and Hillard Pollack; and that in said month said owners agreed to sell and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Stabilimento Metallurgico Ligure v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Karp v. Twenty Three Thirty Ryer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Heaphy v. EidlitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Noto v. HeadleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964