Acosta v. Wollett
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The record contains substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioners engaged in an unjustified “concerted stoppage of work or slowdown” in violation of subdi*763vision 1 of section 210 of the Civil Service Law. This is not to say that the record would not have supported a contrary conclusion; but judicial review of these matters is limited. Where on the whole record the hearing officer’s determination is supported by substantial evidence our review is at an end.
Chief Judge Cooke and…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Café La China Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Soto v. KoehlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Romero v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Verdell v. Lincoln Amsterdam House, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Blanco v. PopolizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.