Legal Opinion
IN RE: CHROMACODE LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 22, 2025No. 5:23-cv-04823Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 Case No. 23-cv-04823-EKL 8 IN RE: CHROMACODE LITIGATION CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 9 10 11 12 13 The patents asserted in this case relate to biochemical tests for detecting the presence of 14 specific polynucleotide sequences within samples using fluorescent signals. The parties propose 15 competing constructions of ten terms across five patents. The Court held a tutorial and a 16 Markman hearing regarding the construction of the disputed terms, and ordered supplemental 17 briefing. After considering the parties’ papers…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.