Legal Opinion

Waxman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1926No. 4799PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

Complaint was made to the prohibition office at San Francisco that a still was maintained and operated at 618 Thirty-Third avenue by one' Charles Waxman. On the evening of December 30,1925, two prohibition agents drove by the premises in question and detected a strong odor of mash emanating therefrom. The agents called two police officers to their assistance, and the four visited the place. Being admitted, they informed Waxman that there was a strong odor, of mash coming from the house,” and, that there must be a still at some place on the premises. Wax-man said: “There…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. United States v. Ernest T. PageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. BiancoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Giacolone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API