Peterson v. Shalala
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CAMBRIDGE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court for review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services.1 This Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3).
Upon review of the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, the transcript of the hearing before the Administrative Law Judge, and relevant law, the Court concludes, as further explained below, that the decision of the Secretary should be affirmed.
BACKGROUND
The facts in this case are adequately summarized in the opinion of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Viola BROWNING, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Willie Earl McSWAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Lawrence E. GAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Betty J. MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of HHS, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.