Legal Opinion

United States v. Lay

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2010No. 08-3892Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

612 F.3d 440 (2010)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Mark D. LAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-3892.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: April 27, 2010.

Decided and Filed: July 14, 2010.

ARGUED: Michael L. Cioffi, Blank Rome LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Antoinette T. Bacon, Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Michael L. Cioffi, Nathaniel R. Jones, Rachel L. Payne, Blank Rome LLP, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Antoinette T. Bacon, Laura McMullen Ford, Assistant United States Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.

Befo…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rogers; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. John R. Prince (98-6361), Tony White (98-6362)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API