Legal Opinion
King v. Dean
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 3, 1968No. 1224PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColb, J.
This is a case originating in the Marion Municipal Court, involving the issue as to whether a real estate broker, plaintiff below, was entitled to a commission on the sale of the defendants’ residence property. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, resulting in judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,740. It is before this court on appeal on questions of law by the defendants below.
In brief the facts are these: On March 14, 1966, the defendants gave to the plaintiff an exclusive contract of sale which is as follows:
“King Service
707 Mt. Vernon Ave. Marion, Ohio Phone 382-4467
E…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bullis Thomas v. CalvertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Werner v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Frederick A. Schmidt Co. v. MallOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Kalna v. FialkoOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Lauch v. BreitholleOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tambur's, Inc. v. HiltnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Barrick Realty Co. v. BoganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gendron Realty, Inc. v. N.J. Gendron Lumber Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Moses v. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Garafano v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.