Tate v. State

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

Quanton Tate appeals from his armed robbery conviction, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, and arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after the state allegedly placed his character in evidence. Because the evidence was sufficient and Tate’s character was not placed in evidence, we affirm his conviction.

1. Tate contends that the state failed to prove his guilt because the victim’s identification of him as one of the three armed robbers was not reliable. Specifically, Tate says that the victim told…