Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. King

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in denying his Post Conviction Hearing Act 1 petition without a hearing. Because appellant did not receive the assistance of counsel in preparing his PCHA petition, we vacate the lower court’s order and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On September 10, 1976, appellant filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas. In this petition, appellant alleged that his state convictions on charges of possessing and delivering a controlled substance 2 contravened his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FieroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. BurkettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. CochranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. JeffersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. GoodmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API