Legal Opinion
Pribus v. Bush
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1981No. Civ. 23473PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRIS, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment enjoining the foreclosure of a trust deed on plaintiff’s house, and ordering the cancellation of a promissory note signed by plaintiff. Judgment was entered against defendant after the trial court concluded that he was not a holder in due course.
Facts
Charles Pribus, the son of Helen Pribus (plaintiff), owed $126,500 to Ford and Mary Williams. At Charles’ request, plaintiff executed a promissory note for $126,500 and a trust deed on plaintiffs house to secure the note, both in favor of the Williams. Charles delivered the trust deed to Ford…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estrada v. River Oaks Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Crosby v. RoubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
- Security Pacific National Bank v. ChessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Shepherd Mall State Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co. v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southwestern Resolution Corp. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- All American Finance Co. v. Pugh Shows, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Big Builders, Inc. v. IsraelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re StanleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.