Packineau v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants were convicted under an indictment in one count charging both of them with the crime of rape committed on an Indian reservation in violation of Section 1153, Title 18, U.S.C., which provides: “Any Indian who commits against the person or property of another Indian or other person any of the following offenses, namely, * * * rape, * * * within the Indian country, shall be subject to the same laws and penalties as all other persons committing any of the above offenses, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States. As used in this section, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tanksley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Echert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ernest Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Larry Howard Homan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Abraham KastoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Milenkovic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.