In re Parsons

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990 and maintained a law office in Plattsburgh.

Respondent is currently suspended from practice because of her continuing failure to comply with a subpoena duces tecum obtained by petitioner in November 1997 in furtherance of its investigation of client complaints against her (Matter of Parsons, 248 AD2d 888).

*1062By petition filed in July 1998, petitioner preferred eight charges of professional misconduct against respondent. She has not answered or otherwise appeared in response to the petition or the subsequent default judgment motion, both of…