Legal Opinion

Walnut Hill Bank v. National Reserve Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 1913Published

Appeal by the defendant, The National Reserve Bank of the City of New York, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of April, 1912, affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiff, and also (as stated in the notice of appeal) from, a judgment of the City Court entered on the 15th day of April, 1912, upon said order of affirmance.

1Per curiam

This action was brought in the City Court and there have been two trials. Upon the first trial plaintiff had a judgment, which was affirmed by the Appellate Term, and its determination reversed by this court and a new trial ordered (141 App. Div. 475). . The second trial also resulted in a judgment in favor of' the plaintiff, which was affirmed by the Appellate Term (76 Misc. Rep. 220), and the defendant appeals from that determination.

The facts are fully, set forth in the opinion delivered on the *468former appeal, so that it is unnecessary to restate them. It was there said that “ the notice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walnut Hill Bank v. National Reserve BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Walnut Hill Bank v. National Reserve BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API