Legal Opinion

Krouzian v. Hagopian

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1959No. Civ. 17870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a previous judgment and to enter a different judgment.

Question Presented

Were the previous findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment signed and entered through the trial court’s inadvertence and mistake?

Record

After a trial on April 26, 1957, the trial judge on May 8 signed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on May 9 signed and had entered a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $200 (based on plaintiff’s second cause of action), in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s first cause of action, and granting defendant a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Minardi v. CollopyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Morgan v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Hickman v. St. AubynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API