Krouzian v. Hagopian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a previous judgment and to enter a different judgment.
Question Presented
Were the previous findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment signed and entered through the trial court’s inadvertence and mistake?
Record
After a trial on April 26, 1957, the trial judge on May 8 signed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on May 9 signed and had entered a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $200 (based on plaintiff’s second cause of action), in favor of defendant on plaintiff’s first cause of action, and granting defendant a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bastajian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Minardi v. CollopyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Morgan v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Nacht v. NachtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Hickman v. St. AubynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963