Legal Opinion

Royal & Sun Alliance v. New York Central Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*887In an action for a judgment, inter alia, declaring that the plaintiff Royal & Sun Alliance is entitled to reimbursement from the defendant New York Central Mutual Insurance Company of all costs associated with the defense and settlement of an underlying personal injury action entitled Basso v Felsenburg, commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 564/97, the defendant New York Central Mutual Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated June 14, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to confirm a report of a judicial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Shen v. ShenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Slater v. Links at North HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taub v. TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. HSBC Bank USA v. McKennaNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Donovan v. Empire Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Ferentini v. FerentiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API