Harrah v. People Ex Rel. Attorney General
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We will hereinafter refer to plaintiff in error as Harrah; to defendant in error as the'People.; and to the State Board of Land Commissioners as the Land Board.
The People, as plaintiff, filed a “Complaint in Forcible Entry and Detainer” against Harrah in which it was alleged that the Land Board is vested with control and disposition of public lands of Colorado; that the particular land, which we identify as tract three (3) located within the City and County of Denver, is public land under the control of the Land Board; that in an action in the district court of Denver, by judgment duly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GibsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Fanstiel v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Ahearn v. GobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Steck v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Witcher v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Evans v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- East Lake Creek Ranch, LLP v. BrotmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. SalgadoColorado Court of Appeals · 2019