Legal Opinion

Harrah v. People Ex Rel. Attorney General

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 21, 1952No. 16842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

We will hereinafter refer to plaintiff in error as Harrah; to defendant in error as the'People.; and to the State Board of Land Commissioners as the Land Board.

The People, as plaintiff, filed a “Complaint in Forcible Entry and Detainer” against Harrah in which it was alleged that the Land Board is vested with control and disposition of public lands of Colorado; that the particular land, which we identify as tract three (3) located within the City and County of Denver, is public land under the control of the Land Board; that in an action in the district court of Denver, by judgment duly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GibsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Fanstiel v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. Ahearn v. GobleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  4. Steck v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Witcher v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Evans v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. East Lake Creek Ranch, LLP v. BrotmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. SalgadoColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API