Abadie v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant IIU Consulting Institute, Inc. (“IIU”), and appellee Trifax Corporation, Inc. (“Trifax”), were competing bidders for a District of Columbia government contract. After the contract was awarded to IIU, Trifax filed a protest with the Contract Appeals Board. Several weeks later, Trifax amended its protest to raise additional grounds for overturning the award. The Contract Appeals Board sustained the protest on one of the added grounds, rejecting the argument that it was untimely, and the Superior Court upheld the Board.
Bid protests are subject to strict…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Group Insurance AdministrationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Jones & Artis Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Dano Resource Recovery, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Eagle Maintenance Services, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Sawyer Property Management of Maryland, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MorphoTrust USA, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Urban Development Solutions, LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONTRACT APPEALS BOARD, and PRINCE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and W.M. SCHLOSSER CONSTRUCTION CO., INCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- MorphoTrust USA, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015