Legal Opinion

S.M. v. M.M.-M.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2015Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul I. Marx, J.

It is ordered that defendant’s motion for pendente lite relief and interim counsel fees is disposed of as follows.

Background

The parties were married on June 6, 1998. There are three children of the marriage: Z, born in 1999; Y, born in 2001; and M, born in 2005. The parties and their children reside in the marital residence in Yonkers, New York. Plaintiff is currently living in Toronto, Canada, where he has been working on a church renovation project for the past 10 months.

Plaintiff is a 62-year-old architect who is a renowned church and cathedral…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Khaira v. KhairaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Matwijczuk v. MatwijczukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. George v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Maharam v. MaharamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Goldberg v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API