Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartough v. Safeway Lines, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1939No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 40,216Published

1DissentWiest, J.

In this case we found the damages awarded plaintiff excessive and granted a new trial. Hartough v. Safeway Lines, Inc., ante, 471.

On plaintiff’s application we granted a rehearing.

Plaintiff asks affirmance of the judgment stating,, however:

“That if, upon reconsideration, the court still deems the damages excessive, it state a sum to be remitted on condition of affirmance. ’ ’

Upon reconsideration we are still of the opinion that the damages awarded were so excessive as to preclude granting a conditional remittitur.

Under the record the following observation of Lord Phillimore, in Lionel Barber…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Powers v. IrishMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hall v. Calhoun Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Hoeft v. KockMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API