Legal Opinion

Kinsley v. Carravetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 12, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

This action is predicated upon the theory of malpractice on the part of the defendants while respondent was a patient in Fordham Hospital, a city institution. At the close of the entire case, without objection on the part of the respondent, a verdict was directed in favor of Drs. Carravetta and Drews. The jury returned a verdict against the appellants.

*214The defendant Dr. Carravetta was an interne in the hospital and his immediate superior was the defendant Dr. Drews, who was house surgeon. Dr. Nicoll, one of the appellants, was a director of surgery in general charge of a ward, made up of one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. George v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Smith v. BeardWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Calhoun v. GaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Homere v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1974
  5. Hendry v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API