Lungard v. Bertram
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.:
In the petition, the appellees alleged that “an account was stated between the plaintiffs and the defendants and the sum of One Thousand, Four Hundred, Seventy and Twenty-six Hundredths ($1470.26) Dollars was found to be due to the plaintiffs from the defendants as of June 23rd, 1947.” The prayer was for judgment for that sum plus interest.
There were two defendants and they filed separate answers, denying the above-quoted allegations of the petition. An amended answer was filed later by the defendant, Harvey P. Bertram Company, Inc. to which was attached certain inter…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re N.K.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Hauer v. Provident Savings Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959
- Home Loan Savs. Bank v. Jahweh L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.